A magazine like Popular Science should be held to a higher standard than today's "Fake news" marketing re-hashing websites, which is why it's very disappointing to see them print an article on the thoroughly busted Indiegogo WaterSeer without any kind of basic fact checking or questioning of it's practicality.
P.S. The article author was contacted for comment but did not reply.
UPDATE: Popular Science ran another article not quite retracting their previous article, but acknowledging the issues.
Forum: !-(water-seer)/
Fontus VIDEO:
Thunderf00t VIDEO:
EEVblog Main Web Site:
The 2nd EEVblog Channel:
Support the EEVblog through Patreon!
EEVblog Amazon Store (Dave gets a cut):
T-Shirts:
Fpvracer.lt is not the owner of this text/video/image/photo content, the real source of content is Youtube.com and user declared in this page publication as Youtube.com user,
if you have any question about video removal, what was shared by open community, please contact Youtube.com directly or report bad/not working video links directly to video owner on Youtube.com. Removed video from Youtube.com will also be removed from here.
Auto moto parkas 2021-11-28 SandBOX
#Shorts massive servo wire attack
DeathStroke BambuLab X1C #Shorts